Tracks
Fifteen tracks, each at its actual stage
From students in Grade 3 to board directors, published with actual status rather than as a finished catalog. One track is available today. The rest are labeled honestly, because a roadmap presented as a product is the fastest way to lose an institutional buyer.
AI in Education
Major AI in Education assessments
Teachers, faculty, students by grade band, and the parents and caregivers who support them.
K-12 Education
Available nowV 1.0Published and in use. Available to participating K-12 organizations through an access code.Higher Education
In CVI reviewV 0.2Items drafted and undergoing Content Validity Index review by an independent expert panel.K-12 Students, Grades 3-5
In CVI reviewV 0.1For students aged about 8 to 11. Concrete AI situations, read-aloud administration, and a strong trusted-adult boundary.K-12 Students, Grades 6-8
In CVI reviewV 0.1For students aged about 11 to 14. School and social AI use, misinformation, academic integrity, privacy, and help-seeking.K-12 Students, Grades 9-12
In CVI reviewV 0.1For students aged about 14 to 18. Research and evidence, data use, accountability, fairness, and consequential AI decisions.Parents and Caregivers
In CVI reviewV 0.1For parents, guardians, and caregivers of school-age children. AI understanding, critical evaluation, safeguarding, and family AI governance.Professional practice
Professional and sector assessments
Knowledge workers, public service, and regulated and creative industries.
Professional and Knowledge Worker
In CVI reviewV 0.1Items drafted and undergoing Content Validity Index review by an independent expert panel.Government and Military
In CVI reviewV 0.1Items drafted and undergoing Content Validity Index review by an independent expert panel.Healthcare and Clinical
In developmentFor physicians, nurses and clinical staff navigating AI in patient care, diagnostics and healthcare operations.Legal
In developmentFor lawyers, paralegals and legal professionals integrating AI within the bounds of professional ethics and confidentiality.Financial Services
In developmentFor banking, insurance and capital-markets professionals working under supervisory expectations for model risk and conduct.Executive and Board Leadership
In developmentFor executives and non-executive directors carrying oversight responsibility for AI adoption.Creative and Media
In developmentFor designers, writers, journalists and media professionals working with generated content and provenance.Insurance
In developmentFor underwriting, claims, actuarial and distribution professionals working under supervisory expectations for AI use in insurance.Journalism and News Media
In developmentFor reporters, editors, producers and newsroom leaders using AI in reporting, verification and publishing.What each status means
Your track directs itself
Participants do not choose a track. The access code an organization issues is bound to one, and entering the code puts the participant on the right instrument automatically. A school can hold codes for its teachers, its students by grade band, and its parents at the same time.
If your audience is not available yet
Register interest on the assessment site, choosing the track you need. We will tell you when it is published and offer the pilot cohort first. We would rather you waited than bought something we cannot yet stand behind.
Common questions
How many tracks does the AI Competency Assessment have?
Fifteen. Six are in education: K-12 teachers, higher education faculty, students in three grade bands (3 to 5, 6 to 8, and 9 to 12), and parents and caregivers. Nine are in professional practice: professional and knowledge worker, government and military, healthcare and clinical, legal, financial services, insurance, executive and board leadership, creative and media, and journalism and news media.
Which tracks are available today?
One: K-12 Education, at version 1.0, through an organization access code. Every other track is either in Content Validity Index review or in development, and is labeled that way on this page. Nothing is sold before it has passed review.
Is there an assessment for students, not only teachers?
Yes. Three student tracks, by grade band: Grades 3 to 5 (about ages 8 to 11, administered read-aloud), Grades 6 to 8 (about ages 11 to 14) and Grades 9 to 12 (about ages 14 to 18). All three are at version 0.1 and in Content Validity Index review. They are anchored to the OECD and European Commission AI Literacy Framework for Primary and Secondary Education and the UNESCO AI Competency Framework for Students.
Is there an assessment for parents?
Yes. The Parents and Caregivers track measures AI understanding, critical evaluation, safeguarding and family AI governance, answered in relation to the respondent’s own child or children. It is at version 0.1 and in Content Validity Index review.
Do participants choose their own track?
No. The access code an organization issues is bound to one track, and entering it puts the participant on the right instrument automatically.
Sources
- UNESCO AI Competency Framework for TeachersUNESCO, September 2024. 15 competencies across five dimensions and three progression levels.
- UNESCO AI Competency Framework for StudentsUNESCO, September 2024. 12 competencies across four dimensions and three progression levels.
- OECD and European Commission AI Literacy FrameworkOECD and the European Commission, 2026. AI literacy framework for primary and secondary education. Four domains: Engage with AI, Create with AI, Manage AI, Shape AI.
- UNICEF Guidance on AI and ChildrenUNICEF Innocenti, version 3.0, 2025. Ten requirements for child-centered AI, drawing on the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
- Digital Promise AI Literacy FrameworkDigital Promise, 2024. Three modes of engagement: understand, evaluate, use.
- ABA Formal Opinion 512American Bar Association Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility, July 2024. Generative artificial intelligence tools.
- FSB, The Financial Stability Implications of Artificial IntelligenceFinancial Stability Board, November 2024.
- IOSCO, Artificial Intelligence in Capital MarketsInternational Organization of Securities Commissions, March 2025. Use cases, risks and challenges.
- NAIC Model Bulletin on the Use of AI Systems by InsurersNational Association of Insurance Commissioners, adopted December 2023. Expectations for governance, risk management and documentation of AI systems used by insurers.
- EIOPA Opinion on AI governance and risk managementEuropean Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, 2025. Supervisory expectations for the governance and risk management of AI systems in insurance.
- NACD AI governance guidanceNational Association of Corporate Directors. Board oversight of artificial intelligence.
- OECD AI PrinciplesOECD, adopted 2019 and updated 2024. The first intergovernmental standard on AI, with 47 adherents.
- C2PACoalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity, a Linux Foundation project. Content Credentials provenance standard.
- Paris Charter on AI and JournalismReporters Without Borders with 16 partner organizations, November 2023. Ten principles for the use of AI in newsrooms.
